M. Donatelli et al., CIRCULATING ENDOTHELIN-1 LEVELS IN TYPE-2 DIABETIC-PATIENTS WITH ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE, Acta diabetologica, 33(3), 1996, pp. 246-248
To investigate whether circulating endothelin-1 (Et-1) may be related
to the increased incidence and severity of ischaemic heart disease in
type 2 diabetes mellitus, we compared the concentrations in type 2 dia
betic patients and in non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disea
se (CAD) angiographically documented. Plasma levels of Et-1 were deter
mined in 34 type 2 diabetic patients with CAD (16 with stable angina,
6 with unstable angina, 12 with previous myocardial infarction) and in
19 nondiabetic patients with CAD (4 with stable angina, 5 with unstab
le angina, 19 with previous myocardial infarction). Fifteen diabetic p
atients without CAD and 9 healthy volunteers served as control subject
s. In the type 2 diabetic patients, the mean Et-1 levels were 3.19+/-1
.61 pmol/l in those with stable angina, 3.58+/-1.92 pmol/l in those wi
th unstable angina, 4.24+/-2.53 pmol/l in those with myocardial infarc
tion. These values were not significantly different one another, nor f
rom the values obtained from type 2 diabetic controls (3.64+/-2.13 pmo
l/l). In the non-diabetic patients, the mean Et-1 levels were 3.92+/-0
.73 pmol/l in those with stable angina, 4.35+/-1.67 pmol/l in those wi
th unstable angina, 4.33+/-1.66 pmol/l in those with myocardial infarc
tion. These values were not significantly different one another, but s
ignificantly higher than those obtained from healthy controls (2.07+/-
0.67 pmol/l; P<0.001). No significant differences were found in Et-1 l
evels between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with stable, unstable
angina and previous myocardial infarction. In contrast. a statistical
ly significant difference was found in Et-1 levels between diabetic an
d non-diabetic control subjects (P<0.05), In conclusion, similar raise
d concentrations of Et-1 in diabetic and cion-diabetic patients with s
table, unstable angina and previous myocardial infarction do nor suppo
rt the hypothesis that higher levels of Et-1 in diabetic patients are
responsible for the increased incidence of CAD in diabetes mellitus. H
owever, the raised Et-1 levels found in diabetic patients in the absen
ce of CAD strongly suggest that a generalised endothelial dysfunction,
documented in our study by increased levels of Et-1, most probably pr
ecedes subsequent cardiovascular diseases.