L. Sinoway et al., FOREARM TRAINING ATTENUATES SYMPATHETIC RESPONSES TO PROLONGED RHYTHMIC FOREARM EXERCISE, Journal of applied physiology, 81(4), 1996, pp. 1778-1784
We previously demonstrated that nonfatiguing rhythmic forearm exercise
at 25% maximal voluntary contraction (12 2-s contractions/min) evokes
sympathoexcitation without significant engagement of metabolite-sensi
tive muscle afferents (B. A. Batman, J. C. Hardy, U. A. Leuenberger, M
. B. Smith, Q. X. Yang, and L. I. Sinoway. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 1077-
1081, 1994). This is in contrast to the sympathetic nervous system res
ponses observed during fatiguing static forearm exercise where metabol
ite-sensitive afferents are the key determinants of sympathetic activa
tion. In this report we examined whether forearm exercise training wou
ld attenuate sympathetic nervous system responses to rhythmic forearm
exercise. We measured heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP),
muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography), plasma norepinep
hrine (NE), and NE spillover and clearance (tritiated NE kinetics) dur
ing nonfatiguing rhythmic forearm exercise before and after a 4-wk uni
lateral forearm training paradigm. Training had no effect on forearm m
ass, maximal voluntary contraction, or heart rate but did attenuate th
e increase in MAP (increase in MAP: from 15.2 +/- 1.8 before training
to 11.4 +/- 1.4 mmHg after training; P < 0.017), muscle sympathetic ne
rve activity (increase in bursts: from 10.8 +/- 1.4 before training to
6.2 +/- 1.1 bursts/min after training; P < 0.030), and the NE spillov
er (increase in arterial spillover: from 1.3 +/- 0.2 before training t
o 0.6 +/- 0.2 nmol . min(-1). m(-2) after training, P < 0.014; increas
e in venous spillover: from 2.0 +/- 0.6 before training to 1.0 +/- 0.5
nmol . min(-1). m(-2) after training, P < 0.037) seen in response to
exercise performed by the trained forearm. Thus forearm training reduc
es sympathetic responses during a nonfatiguing rhythmic handgrip parad
igm that does not-engage muscle metaboreceptors. We speculate that thi
s effect is due to a conditioning-induced reduction in mechanically se
nsitive muscle afferent discharge.