A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED AND ACTIVE-CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT OF SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS WITH MOMETASONE FUROATEAQUEOUS NASAL SPRAY
D. Graft et al., A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED AND ACTIVE-CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF PROPHYLACTIC TREATMENT OF SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS WITH MOMETASONE FUROATEAQUEOUS NASAL SPRAY, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 98(4), 1996, pp. 724-731
Background: Topical nasal corticosteroids have become a mainstay of tr
eatment for the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), it is li
kely that topical corticosteroids, by, blocking an initial influx of i
nflammatory cells in the nasal mucosa induced by aa aeroallergens, may
have a preventive effect on nasal allergy symptoms when administered
before the pollen season. Objective: This study was designed to assess
the efficacy and safety of an 8-week course of mometasone furoate nas
al spray (MFNS), 200 mu g once daily, in the treatment of SAR compared
with beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray (BDP), 168 mu g
twice daily, and placebo vehicle, when treatment is initiated before t
he anticipated-onset of the ragweed season. Methods: Three hundred for
ty-nine patients with SAR to ragweed pollen from nine centers in the N
ortheast and Midwest of the United States were randomized to one of th
e three intranasal study medications (MFNS, 200 mu g once daily BDP, 1
68 mu g twice daily or placebo, vehicle), starting 4 week before the e
stimated start of the ragweed season. Results: The proportion of ''min
imal symptom'' days (total nasal symptom score less than or equal to 2
) was statistically significantly higher in both the MFNS and BDP grou
ps when compared with the placebo vehicle group (p < 0.01). The two ac
tive treatment groups were not statistically significantly different f
rom each other. MFNS and BDP displayed a similar safety profile that d
id nor differ from placebo. Conclusions: This suggests that MFNS, 200
mu g (once daily), is a useful therapy in the prophylactic treatment o
f SAR.