GRAZING BY MEROPLANKTONIC POLYCHAETE LARVAE MAY HELP TO CONTROL NANOPLANKTON IN THE NW MEDITERRANEAN LITTORAL - IN-SITU EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE

Citation
D. Martin et al., GRAZING BY MEROPLANKTONIC POLYCHAETE LARVAE MAY HELP TO CONTROL NANOPLANKTON IN THE NW MEDITERRANEAN LITTORAL - IN-SITU EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE, Marine ecology. Progress series, 143(1-3), 1996, pp. 239-246
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Marine & Freshwater Biology",Ecology
ISSN journal
01718630
Volume
143
Issue
1-3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
239 - 246
Database
ISI
SICI code
0171-8630(1996)143:1-3<239:GBMPLM>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
In this paper, we test the potential meroplankton grazing pressure on the nanoplanktonic community at the Bay of Blanes (NW Mediterranean). We used 2 abundant polychaete larvae (Prionospio malmgreni and Loimia medusa) cultured in situ in dialysis bags from which possible nanoplan kton grazers other than larvae had been removed by filtration. Ingesti on rates on chlorophyll a ranged from 0.001 to 0.04 and from 0.045 to 0.117 mu g larva(-1) d(-1) for P. malmgreni and L. medusa, respectivel y. Ingestion rates on heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) ranged from 2.4 to 32.3 x 10(3) and from 20.8 to 128.0 x 10(3) cells larva(-1) d(- 1) for P. malmgreni and L. medusa, respectively. Scaling larval grazin g to the natural plankton community results in: (1) a consumption on n anophytoplankton production ranging between 2.5 and 7.0%, correspondin g to percentages of nanophytoplankton loss in ambient waters of 2.3 to 6.4%, respectively; (2) a consumption on HNF production ranging betwe en 3.1 and 12.4%, corresponding to percentages of HNF loss in ambient waters of 2.9 to 11.7%, respectively. Although limited in time, the pr esence of planktotrophic larvae could cause an impact on nanophytoplan kton populations which could be of similar relevance to that of holopl anktonic grazers, at least in shallow littoral waters of the Mediterra nean Sea. Although potentially high, the estimated ingestion of nanoph ytoplankton by polychaete larvae was not sufficient to explain the maj or losses observed in the field, suggesting that these losses must be a result of consumption by other zooplanktonic grazers as well, and/or from processes other than herbivory. Contrary to nanophytoplankton an d HNF, bacteria showed enhanced abundance in the presence of both poly chaete larvae. Grazing by polychaete larvae caused a disruption of the grazing control exerted by HNF on bacteria. In conclusion, our result s strongly indicate an important trophic role of meroplankton both as a direct control of the microbial holoplanktonic populations, and as a source of cascading effects in the microbial planktonic food webs.