Lm. Webber et al., ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY FOR HEPATITIS-C VIRUS SEROTYPING, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 49(12), 1996, pp. 994-997
Aims-To assess a commercial enzyme immunoassay (ELA) for the serotypin
g of hepatitis C virus (HCV) for routine use in a diagnostic laborator
y setting, as well as for noting the serotype prevalence of selected s
pecimens. Methods-Seventy six serum specimens, submitted to the labora
tory for routine hepatitis studies between May 1992 and February 1996
and stored at -20 degrees C, were evaluated. These specimens were cate
gorised into specific hepatic, renal, and paediatric clinical conditio
ns. The specimens all tested positive for HCV antibodies on a screenin
g EIA, with confirmation on a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). Cer
tain specimens were also HCV RNA positive by the reverse transcription
polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). All the specimens were serotyped
using the newly developed serotyping EIA. Results-Twenty seven (35.5%)
specimens were typable. Type 5 predominated (56%), followed by type 1
(33%), types 1 and 6 (7%) and type 3 (4%). The serotype 5 specimens s
howed 85% and 90% reactivity with recombinant antigens c100-3 and c22-
3c, respectively; serotype 1 specimens showed 75% and 100% reactivity
with these antigens. All serotype 5 specimens reacted with the c33-c a
ntigen, but only 60% of serotype 1 specimens reacted with this antigen
. The differences in the reactivity of the serotype 5 and serotype 1 s
pecimens for c33-c antigen in the RIBA were significant, but no signif
icant differences in reactivity for antigens c-1-1, c100-3, and c22-3
were noted. Serotype 3 specimens showed equal reactivity with all four
antigens used in the RIBA. Conclusion-The serotyping EW was easy to u
se, rapid, and cost effective compared with molecular assays. This ass
ay seems to be ideal for the routine diagnostic laboratory setting, bu
t could not be used for certain clinical specimens. The demonstration
of serotypes 5, 1, and 3 was not unexpected in this cohort. The occurr
ence of serotype 6, although concurrent and more Likely to be a false
cross reaction with serotype 1 peptides, requires confirmation by mole
cular genotyping before it can be claimed that this type is present in
South Africa.