TRANSPORT OF RECENTLY ASSIMILATED N-15 NITROGEN TO INDIVIDUAL SPIKELETS IN SPRING WHEAT GROWN IN CULTURE SOLUTION

Authors
Citation
P. Oscarson, TRANSPORT OF RECENTLY ASSIMILATED N-15 NITROGEN TO INDIVIDUAL SPIKELETS IN SPRING WHEAT GROWN IN CULTURE SOLUTION, Annals of botany, 78(4), 1996, pp. 479-488
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
03057364
Volume
78
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
479 - 488
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-7364(1996)78:4<479:TORANN>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Sport (high prot ein) and WL4 (low protein), were grown to maturity in culture solution . Nitrogen in the form of nitrate was added in daily doses at stepwise -decreasing relative rates to ensure normal development, and both cult ivars received the same total amount of N during development. At weekl y intervals from anthesis to maturity the daily nitrate dose was, for selected groups of plants, labelled with N-15. After the labelling per iod the selected plants were harvested and analysed. The cultivar WL4 produced more biomass than Sport, as well as more spikelets and more g rains per ear, with a higher mean grain weight, such that grain yield of WL4 was 57% greater than Sport. The ears of both cultivars were het erogenous: mean grain weight was highest in middle spikelets, which al so contained more grains; the N content followed the pattern of dry we ight with more N in the middle spikelets; but the N concentration was practically the same in all spikelets (2.15 % of d. wt in WL4 and 3.33 % in Sport). The distribution of N-15 showed that the main stem ear ma tured much earlier than tiller ears. The results of this nitrogen-labe lling experiment show that, late in development, substantial amounts o f recently-absorbed N were immediately assimilated and transported to the ears. Transport of N-15 decreased earlier to the top spikelets tha n to the bottom spikelets. As both cultivars were grown under identica l conditions and both received the same amount of N it was concluded t hat the difference in grain N concentration was not caused by differen ces in the capacity of N assimilation and translocation but rather by different rates of accumulation of non-nitrogenous dry matter in the g rains. (C) 1996 Annals of Botany Company