Mi. Rudis et al., ECONOMIC-IMPACT OF PROLONGED MOTOR WEAKNESS COMPLICATING NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE IN THE INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT, Critical care medicine, 24(10), 1996, pp. 1749-1756
Objective: We compared a case-series of ten patients who developed pro
longed neuromuscular weakness after continuous, nondepolarizing, neuro
muscular blockade with a group of controls without neuromuscular weakn
ess to determine the economic impact of the neuromuscular weakness. De
sign: Frequency-matched case control trial. Setting: Medical and surgi
cal intensive care units of a 937-bed tertiary care, university-affili
ated teaching hospital. Patients: Ten patients developed prolonged neu
romuscular weakness after continuous administration of nondepolarizing
neuromuscular blockers. Ten patients from a 1994 drug utilization dat
abase who did not develop motor weakness after paralysis were identifi
ed to serve as controls. Measurements and Main Results: The medical an
d accounting records of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. Ch
arge data were obtained from patient accounts. Institutional ratios to
convert charges to full costs and marginal costs were obtained from t
he Hospital Finance Department of Henry Ford Hospital. The economic im
pact of the diagnosis and recovery of the motor weakness was estimated
for the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays and compared wit
h those values for control patients. Median hospital charges (excludin
g rehabilitation), totaling $91,476, were attributed to the patients w
ho developed neuromuscular weakness and included charges for neuromusc
ular blocking agents, continuous mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospi
tal beds, neurologic studies, and physical therapy services. In the co
ntrol patients, median charges were $22,191 (p = .001). The total medi
an cost differential for a patient in the neuromuscular weakness group
was in excess of $66,713 (95% confidence interval $23,485 to $189,214
, p = .001). Significant differences were also found for patient charg
es, full costs, and marginal costs for mechanical ventilation (p = .00
2), neurologic studies (p = .014), as well as ICU (p = .002) and hospi
tal (p = .001) stays. Conclusions: The development of motor weakness w
as associated with an increase in ICU and hospital stays, continued me
chanical ventilation, and disproportionate healthcare expenditures in
excess of $66,000 per patient. A prospective evaluation of the true pr
evalence of neuromuscular weakness after neuromuscular blockade and of
the costs to the healthcare system is needed.