Objective: To assess the long-term use of neuromuscular blocking (NMB)
agents in intensive care, especially with reference to the potential
problems of the long-term use of NMB drugs in the intensive care unit
(ICU). Method: A postal survey questionnaire was sent to 409 ICUs in G
reat Britain. Results: Two hundred thirty-eight completed questionnair
es were returned and analysed. Mast ICUs were anaesthetist-led (85.8%)
will only five ICUs being staffed by full-time intensivists. Facilita
tion of mechanical ventilation and increased intracranial pressure wer
e the main indications for the prolonged use of neuromuscular blockade
. Atracurium and vecuronium (83%) were administered most commonly by b
olus alone (13.8%), bolus followed by continuous infusion (23.9%) or c
ontinuous infusion only (60.9%). The most frequently cited criteria fo
r the use of either vecuronium or stracurium were their pharmacokineti
cs and haemodynamic stability. Neuro muscular block was most commonly
monitored clinically (91.7%), with only 8.3% of the responders using a
peripheral nerve stimulator, All responders indicated the concomitant
use of sedatives (propofol/midazolam alone or in combination in combi
nation in 89.4% of responders) and/or opioids (morphine, fentanyl or a
lfentanil in 74.8% of respondents) with muscle relaxants. Conclusion:
Most responders agreed that while neuromuscular block in the ICU popul
ation may provide advantages, it cannot be considered benign. Indeed,
a great majority consider that NMB agents should be used only as a las
t option and for as short a period as possible.