Rhv. Jones et al., BIAS IN MURINE IGG ISOTYPE IMMOBILIZATION IMPLICATIONS FOR IGG GLYCOFORM ANALYSIS ELISA PROCEDURES, Journal of immunological methods, 197(1-2), 1996, pp. 109-120
This study investigates immobilisation of murine IgG in various ELISA
procedures. Monoclonal murine IgG isotypes and polyclonal IgG from ser
a were studied. Similar binding curves to plastic were found for all f
our individual murine IgG isotypes. Single isotypes displayed differen
t affinities for both protein A and protein G, in particular IgG1 was
poorly and IgG3 strongly bound to both of these proteins. When mixture
s of the isotypes were bound to either plastic, protein A or protein G
, competition was observed in which IgG3 was dominant. Paradoxically,
studies on the binding rates of single isotypes direct to plastic reve
aled that IgG3 had the slowest binding rate. Heating of bound IgGs res
ulted in significant but isotypically non-selective losses from the pl
ates. The data demonstrate that despite obtaining equivalent individua
l IgG isotype binding curves, mixtures of IgG isotypes behave very dif
ferently, with competition for binding occurring even on plastic. The
IgG isotype levels of murine sera were measured for individual mice, a
nd the capture efficiency of each Ige isotype by protein A determined
at different serum dilutions. Comparisons were made between the observ
ed capture levels of IgG isotypes and their known serum levels. At all
dilutions tested, greater than expected binding of IgG3, IgG2b and Ig
G2a was observed. At a serum dilution of 1/100 the binding of these th
ree isotypes was increased 16-, 2.9- and 0.4-fold, respectively. These
increases were balanced by a decrease in IgG1 binding which was the m
ost prevalent serum IgG isotype. The results described above suggest t
hat capture techniques are biased and unlikely to provide a coating of
IgG isotypes that accurately reflects that of the serum. This bias is
derived from the specificity of the individual isotypes for either pr
otein A or protein G, and the errors further compounded by direct comp
etition between isotypes whatever the capture surface. Induced coalesc
ence of IgG3 may explain the latter observations.