Socialization is one of the defining concepts of symbolic interactioni
sm. This essay redirects attention to that area by reviewing the works
of Spencer E. Cahill, William A. Corsaro, and Norman K. Denzin, three
scholars who have had little attention paid to their work on childhoo
d socialization. Under the rubrics of (a) stages: automatic or conting
ent?, (b) play and games, (c) peer groups and cultures, (d) gender ide
ntity, and (e) public behavior, it is argued that these scholars have
advanced symbolic interaction theory on childhood socialization by fea
turing the constructive, communal, and collective aspects of socializa
tion. A summary of similarities and differences among these authors is
made, especially noting Corsaro's conceptualization of ''interpretive
reproduction.'' A critique focuses on some inadequacies in their work
along with suggestions for future research.