Estimates of the response of agricultural supply to movements in expec
ted price display curiously large variation across crops, regions, and
time periods. We argue that this anomaly may be traced, at least in p
art, to the statistical properties of the commonly used econometric es
timator, which has infinite moments of all orders and may have a bimod
al distribution. We propose an alternative minimum-expected-loss estim
ator, establish its improved sample properties, and argue for its usef
ulness in the empirical analysis of agricultural supply response.