For prehensile tasks, where objects are located beyond the normal reac
hing space, the trunk is bent forward to assist in the transport of th
e wrist to the object. Such task behaviors raise complex motor control
issues such as how is the trunk movement incorporated into the motor
plan. In this experiment, seated subjects were asked to reach and gras
p a small and a large object placed on a table located beyond their ma
ximal reach. Forward trunk bending was required to extend the reach di
stance. For such reaching movements, the wrist velocity consisted of a
bell shape profile similar to those seen when the arm is the sole tra
nsport agent. In most trials, the trunk was the first to initiate move
ment, although there was no strict pattern of initiation order. The tr
ansport data showed that trunk and arm movement components were decoup
led at the end of the reach. While the object was being grasped and li
fted, the trunk continued moving for approximately 180 ms after the gr
asp. Wrist deceleration time expressed in absolute and relative values
was sensitive to object size. The time from maximum peak aperture to
the end of wrist movement also was significantly longer for grasping t
he small compared to the large object. No such relationships were obse
rved for the trunk. Temporal coupling was only observed between the gr
ip and wrist transport component. Time to maximum aperture was signifi
cantly correlated with time to peak wrist deceleration and only rarely
with time to trunk deceleration peak. When the trunk participates in
the transport of the wrist to an object, these findings suggest that o
nly the wrist component is directly related to the achievement of the
grasp. While the trunk assisted the arm to reach the object, the kinem
atic parameter recorded did not reveal any evidence of direct coupling
. The presented data suggests that the planning takes place at the lev
el of the hand and that endpoint is the primary variable controlled.