THE VALIDITY OF CHILDRENS SELF-REPORTED EXPOSURE TO TRAFFIC

Authors
Citation
Mr. Stevenson, THE VALIDITY OF CHILDRENS SELF-REPORTED EXPOSURE TO TRAFFIC, Accident analysis and prevention, 28(5), 1996, pp. 599-605
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath",Transportation
ISSN journal
00014575
Volume
28
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
599 - 605
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-4575(1996)28:5<599:TVOCSE>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
This paper reports on a series of studies of the validity of children' s self-reported exposure to traffic. The studies were conducted within a larger case-control study carried out in the metropolitan area of P erth, Western Australia. For these validity studies, subjects were ran domly selected from the original pool of case (n = 100) and control (n = 400) subjects. Three techniques were used to assess the validity of the self-reported 'habitual exposure', namely, the 'moving observer' technique, pedestrian diaries, and a test of construct validity. The c hild's regular walking activities during the course of a typical week was considered the child's 'habitual exposure'. The 'moving observer' technique involved either the researcher or research assistant followi ng a random sample of children on their walking trips. A further sampl e of children maintained a 'diary' of their weekly walking trips, and a number of constructs, in this case variables which related, indirect ly, to the child's level of exposure to the road environment, were inc luded in the interview schedule. As two researchers were involved in a ll aspects of this study, intra- and inter-rater reliability were asse ssed and tape-recordings of the interviews were used to determine the reliability of the coded data. No significant differences were found b etween the child's reported exposure to the road environment and eithe r the observed exposure or exposure recorded in pedestrian diaries. Fo r some exposure variables, namely, the number and duration of walking trips, children tended to underestimate their exposure (when compared to the observations of the researchers). For case subjects, the number of roads crossed was also underestimated. The test of construct valid ity indicated that time spent in 'out-of-home activities' (activities other than going to or from school, which involved time spent in the r oad environment) does not correlate strongly with 'habitual exposure'. Intra- and inter-rater reliability and the reliability of transcribed data from taped interviews were all found to be very sound. The studi es indicate that children's self-reported 'habitual exposure' data is a valid measure of his or her actual exposure in the road environment. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd