S. Carmel et Sm. Glick, COMPASSIONATE-EMPATHIC PHYSICIANS - PERSONALITY-TRAITS AND SOCIAL-ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE OR INHIBIT THIS BEHAVIOR PATTERN, Social science & medicine, 43(8), 1996, pp. 1253-1261
Citations number
70
Categorie Soggetti
Social Sciences, Biomedical","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Compassionate-empathic physicians (CEPs) are desired by patients, but
rarely found in medical settings. The purpose of this study was to pro
mote our understanding of this gap by determining personal characteris
tics that distinguish CEPs from other physicians, and organizational f
actors that might enhance or inhibit physicians' compassionate-empathi
c behavior (CEB). In the first stage of the study, three groups of phy
sicians who differed in their compassionate-empathic pattern of behavi
or toward patients were identified by a sociometric questionnaire dist
ributed to 324 physicians ina general hospital. In the second stage, a
lmost all of these physicians (N = 308) were asked to fill out a self
administered structured questionnaire, and 214 (69.5%) responded. Comp
arisons among the three groups show that the physicians identified as
CEPs, more than other physicians, are younger, have fewer years in med
ical practice, and score higher on pro-social, non-stereotypic attitud
es toward patients and on empathy measures. Their self-esteem is, howe
ver, similar to that of the non-CEPs. The CEPs express similar levels
of satisfaction with work on most dimensions, but they report more emo
tional exhaustion (burnout) than other physicians. A consensus among a
ll physicians was found with regard to two rank orders: (a) the import
ant qualities for being ''a good physician''; and (b) the important qu
alities for being promoted in the hospital. However, while empathic be
havior was considered the most important quality for being ''a good ph
ysician'', it was ranked as the least important for being promoted in
the hospital. The conclusions can serve as a scientific base for impro
ving methods of selection of medical students, and for re-evaluating t
he existent criteria for promoting medical staff in general hospitals.
Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd