Kg. Evans et Rj. Loch, USING THE RUSLE TO IDENTIFY FACTORS CONTROLLING EROSION RATES OF MINESOILS, LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 7(3), 1996, pp. 267-277
Observable differences in particle size, smoothness and compaction bet
ween cap site (slope 2 . 8 per cent) and batter site (slope 20 . 7 per
cent) surfaces on the waste rock dump at Ranger Uranium Mine were qua
ntified in terms of revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) param
eter values. Cap site surface material had a K-m (erodibility correcte
d for sediment density) of 0 . 030 and batter site surface material ha
d a K, of 0 . 0056. Using these K-m values (derived from particle size
distributions), slope length and steepness (LS) factors of 0 . 36 for
the cap site and 3 . 66 for the batter site, and a cover (C) factor o
f 0 . 45 for the cap site and 0 . 16 for the batter site, the RUSLE pr
edicts an erosion rate from the cap site that is 1 . 9 times greater t
han erosion from the much steeper batter site. The RUSLE indicates tha
t the finer particle size and blocky soil structure of the cap site (D
-50=0 . 91 mm) compared with the looser granular structure of the batt
er site (D-50 = 1 . 74 mm) strongly influence erosion. The predictions
are similar to observed soil losses from erosion plots on these sites
under rainfall simulation events, for which the measured erosion rate
from the cap site was approximately twice that from the batter site.
For the RUSLE to predict the observed erosion rates, the support pract
ice (P) factor for the cap site would have to be approximately 30 per
cent greater than the P factor for the batter site. The higher cap sit
e P factor probably results from smoothing and compaction caused by ve
hicle movement across the surface. Compaction is considered to have gr
eatly reduced infiltration capacity, thus increasing the erodibility o
f the cap site. Vehicles probably also crushed the surface material at
the cap site, creating the observed finer particle size distribution
and further increasing the erodibility. Compaction, through its effect
s on erodibility (K-m) and surface roughness (P), is concluded to be t
he major cause of higher erosion from the cap site, even though the sl
ope steepness is 10 times less. Parameterisation of the RUSLE quantifi
es the differences between sites and explains the unexpected erosion r
ates observed. The results highlight the need for careful management o
f rehabilitated sites to avoid increases in erosion which may arise fr
om compaction by machinery.