FEASIBILITY OF AORTIC DIAMETER MEASUREMENT BY MULTIPLANE TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR PREOPERATIVE SELECTION END PREPARATION OF HOMOGRAFT AORTIC VALVES
L. Weinert et al., FEASIBILITY OF AORTIC DIAMETER MEASUREMENT BY MULTIPLANE TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY FOR PREOPERATIVE SELECTION END PREPARATION OF HOMOGRAFT AORTIC VALVES, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 112(4), 1996, pp. 954-961
Background: Preoperative knowledge of the aortic annular diameter coul
d enable the preoperative selection and preparation of an appropriatel
y sized homograft aortic valve. Objective: The aims of this study were
to prospectively determine whether the combined use of transthoracic
and multiplane transesophageal echocardiography allows accurate preope
rative aortic annular measurements for the selection and preparation o
f adequately sized homograft aortic valves and to retrospectively eval
uate the influence of the echocardiographic approach (transthoracic vs
transesophageal) and the reader's level of experience on the accuracy
of these measurements. Methods: Aortic annular measurements were perf
ormed before the operation by an experienced reader who used a combina
tion of transthoracic and multiplane transesophageal images of 25 pati
ents (mean age 52 +/- 13 years) referred for homograft aortic valve re
placement. Measurements were also performed retrospectively by three a
dditional readers with different levels of training in echocardiograph
y. These readers acquired aortic annular diameters from prerecorded ta
pes and obtained measurements from each echocardiographic modality ind
ependently. All values were compared with the surgical measurement obt
ained with a ring valve sizer. Results: With the combined echocardiogr
aphic approach, excellent agreement was found between preoperative ech
ocardiographic and surgical measurements (mean difference +/- 2 standa
rd deviations = 0.2 +/- 1.4 mm). All echocardiographic data were found
to be within 2 mm of the surgical measurement. These measurements wer
e used to select and prepare the aortic homograft valve before inserti
on. The accuracy of annular measurements appeared to increase in paral
lel to the level of experience. The aortic annular measurements obtain
ed retrospectively by a second experienced reader were more accurate w
ith the use of transesophageal than with transthoracic echocardiograph
y (p < 0.01). In contrast, the echocardiographic modality had no influ
ence on the accuracy of measurements of less experienced readers (p >
0.2). Conclusions: Preoperative measurement of the aortic annular diam
eter by transthoracic and multiplane transesophageal echocardiography
is accurate and clinically feasible. Preoperative knowledge of the aor
tic annular diameter may be used to select and prepare the aortic homo
graft, improving valve availability and reducing ischemic time.