Rv. Cartar et Mv. Abrahams, RISK-SENSITIVE FORAGING IN A PATCH DEPARTURE CONTEXT - A TEST WITH WORKER BUMBLE BEES, American zoologist, 36(4), 1996, pp. 447-458
Typically, tests of risk-sensitive foraging involve observing a subjec
t's choices of alternative prey types differing in some combination of
mean and variance of expected foraging gain. Here, we consider the pr
oblem of risk-sensitive foraging when there is a single prey type. We
observed worker bumble bees (Bombus occidentalis) foraging in an array
of artificial 2-flower inflorescences. After visiting the bottom flow
er in an inflorescence and obtaining a reward of some size, the bee de
cides whether to visit the top flower or to move to a new inflorescenc
e (a patch departure). Here, risk-sensitive behavior is expressed as t
he forager's choice of patch departure threshold (PDT) of reward obtai
ned in the bottom flower. We measured the PDTs of bees whose colony en
ergy stores (and therefore energy requirements) had been manipulated (
Enhanced or Depleted). Simulations led us to predict that shortfall-mi
nimizing bees should decrease their PDTs when their colony energy rese
rves were depleted, relative to when the reserves were enhanced. Bees
did not use a strict patch departure threshold, but instead the probab
ility of departure varied with nectar volume in the bottom flower. Col
ony energy stores did affect patch departure behavior, but this effect
was confounded by the order in which manipulation of colony reserves
was applied, Further, simulations of observed bee patch departure deci
sions did not produce behavior expected if the decisions were based on
shortfall-minimization. We conclude that a bee's decision of when to
leave an inflorescence is not predicted by a static shortfall-minimizi
ng model. Our results also implicate an important interaction between
learning and foraging requirements. We review risk-sensitivity in bees
, and discuss why risk-sensitive foraging may be adaptive for bumble b
ees.