Rl. Reid et al., A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF OXIDIZED REGENERATED CELLULOSE ADHESION BARRIER (INTERCEED, TC7)ASTERISK ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH HEPARIN, Fertility and sterility, 67(1), 1997, pp. 23-29
Objective: To compare the efficacy of heparin-saturated oxidized regen
erated cellulose absorbable adhesion barrier, Interceed (TC7; Johnson
and Johnson Medical Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) to oxidized regenerated c
ellulose alone for the prevention of postoperative adhesions. Design:
Clinical trial. By random assignment, one ovary was wrapped in oxidize
d regenerated cellulose, and the contralateral ovary was wrapped in ox
idized regenerated cellulose saturated with a heparin solution (1,000
U/mL). Patient(s): Forty women with defects on both ovaries due to adh
esiolysis and/or ovarian cystectomy. Main Outcome Measure: Adhesion fo
rmation and raw ovarian surface area were assessed at second-look lapa
roscopy 10 days to 16 weeks later. Result(s): At the second-look lapar
oscopy, adhesions were present on 52.5% (21/40) of the ovaries treated
with oxidized regenerated cellulose plus heparin and in 65% (26/40) o
f the contralateral ovaries treated with oxidized regenerated cellulos
e alone. For ovaries treated with oxidized regenerated cellulose plus
heparin, the raw surface area was reduced from 9.41 +/- 1.27 cm(2) (me
an +/- SE) at laparotomy to 1.33 +/- 0.52 cm(2) at second-look laparos
copy. The corresponding figures for ovaries treated with oxidized rege
nerated cellulose alone were from 10.24 +/- 1.08 to 1.92 +/- 0.54 cm(2
), respectively. The mean difference between the reductions in raw sur
face area (85.9% for oxidized regenerated cellulose plus heparin; 81.3
% for oxidized regenerated cellulose alone) was not significantly diff
erent from zero (difference = -0.24 cm(2); 95% confidence interval = -
2.56 to 3.04). Conclusion(s): Adding heparin did not enhance significa
ntly the adhesion-reducing capacity of oxidized regenerated cellulose
adhesion barrier when applied to ovarian surfaces after cystectomy and
/or ovariolysis at laparotomy. This conclusion is subject to the possi
bility of a type II error.