Though social behavior has not been overlooked by behavior geneticists
, the number of studies is small when compared to those on individual
traits. One reason for the neglect may be the difficulty of making con
nections between genes and social behaviors, which by definition invol
ve the interaction of two or more organisms. Fuller and Hahn (1976) ad
dressed this issue and described three means of establishing social gr
oups that would facilitate genetic analysis. We survey the literature
on agonistic behavior in mice from 1976 through 1994 and describe inte
resting uses of those three methods. One of those methods (the standar
d tester design) often employs a ''noninteractive'' social partner. We
present data showing that the standard tester design may be more valu
able when using an evocative and interactive standard tester.