GENETIC-POLYMORPHISM OF THE 4TH COMPONENT OF HUMAN-COMPLEMENT - POPULATION STUDY AND PROPOSAL FOR A REVISED NOMENCLATURE BASED ON GENOMIC PCR TYPING OF RODGERS AND CHIDO DETERMINANTS
Pm. Schneider et al., GENETIC-POLYMORPHISM OF THE 4TH COMPONENT OF HUMAN-COMPLEMENT - POPULATION STUDY AND PROPOSAL FOR A REVISED NOMENCLATURE BASED ON GENOMIC PCR TYPING OF RODGERS AND CHIDO DETERMINANTS, European journal of immunogenetics, 23(5), 1996, pp. 335-344
The fourth component of human complement (C4) is coded for by two homo
logous genes, C4A and C4B, located in the class III region of the majo
r histocompatibility complex (MHC). Genetic typing of C4A and B allele
s is routinely carried out by high-voltage agarose gel electrophoresis
. The electrophoretic C4 polymorphism can be further subdivided by the
Rodgers (Rg) and Chido (Ch) blood groups, which are antigenic determi
nants of the C4A and B alpha-chains, respectively. We have used a rece
ntly described direct PCR typing method using sequence-specific primer
s (PCR-SSP) in combination with electrophoretic C4 typing as well as g
enomic RFLP analysis to determine the frequency of C4 allotypes, Rg/Ch
subtypes and C4A-B haplotypes in a family study of the German populat
ion. As the current C4 allele designation does not provide any informa
tion about the presence or absence of Rodgers and Chido antigens, we h
ave developed an extension to the existing C4 nomenclature. This revis
ed allele designation combines the existing numerical allotypes define
d by electrophoretic mobility with eight subtypes (01-08) based on Rg/
Ch PCR genotyping results. Using this approach, most electrophoretic a
llotypes could be subdivided. Among the C4A allotypes, the most common
allele was A0301 (59.9%), and the most common subtype among all elec
trophoretic allotypes was 01 (85.1%; = Rg1,2-positive, Ch-negative). F
or C4B, the most common allele was B0101 (64.3%), and the most common
subtype was 01 (79.6%; = Ch1,2,3,4,5,6-positive, Rg-negative). The su
btypes 03, 04, 07 and 08 of the C4A allotypes, and the subtypes 03, 07
and 08 of the C4B allotypes, were not detected in this study. The ana
lysis of duplicated C4 alleles revealed considerable heterogeneity of
their subtypes. The results demonstrate that all known C4 allotypes ca
n now be assigned unambiguously, which facilitates the identification
of MHC haplotypes relevant for transplantation and disease association
studies.