In both Onomantics and Terminology there are about a half-dozen core c
oncept which overlap but do not coincide with each other. They include
what is called representation, description, cue, tag and notation in
Onomantics and, in Terminology, definition, designation, term, symbol
and name. A lexicographer writing a synonymy for such words might comp
are their meanings to show how they resemble or differ from each other
, using a Semantic (words-to-meanings) point of view. To compare conce
pts (not words) in an Onomantic (Ana-Semantic, or concept-to-tag) cont
ext, one needs to compare the descriptions (definitions) of each conce
pt to sec whether they, indeed, have the same or different essential c
haracteristics. One also needs to compare the notations that situate e
ach concept in a system - even if the definitions of two concepts are
almost the same, one might discover that because two concepts are posi
tioned differently in their respective classification schemes, they ar
e conceptualized differently. Finally, the concept tags (terms) used t
o represent each concept can also be compared semantically, i.e. to se
e whether their connotations and additional meanings support or hamper
the unambiguous recognition of each intended concept. After an introd
uctory display of the two sets of concepts, each of those used in Term
inology is compared systematically, using all three sets of comparison
s, with the nearest equivalent concepts used in Onomantics.