Purpose. To determine whether medical school admission interviewers ch
ange their evaluations and impressions of applicants as a direct resul
t of the interview. Method. In 1991-92, 419 applicants to the Universi
ty of Virginia School of Medicine were interviewed by members of the a
dmission committee in two separate half-hour sessions. After reviewing
each applicant's folder, interviewers rated the applicant before the
interview on six objective scales. After the interview, ratings were a
gain made on the same six scales, on the same form, below the ratings
made before the interview. Data were examined using paired t-tests, Pe
arson correlations, and stepwise multiple-regression analysis. Results
. Of the six scales, only the ratings of Commitment to Serve Others we
re not significantly changed by the interview; the ratings of Familiar
ity with Issues in Medicine changed the most (p < .01 by paired t-test
). The ratings of Overall Impression increased for accepted applicants
and decreased for rejected applicants. Conclusion. The interview did
influence interviewers' ratings made before the interview, and in the
direction consistent with admission decisions, which supports the cont
inued use of the interview. Although the magnitude of the changes was
not large, the changes validate the conviction that the interview aids
in the selection of individuals for medical school.