COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER-PYLORI

Citation
E. Kassa et al., COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR DETECTION OF HELICOBACTER-PYLORI, East African medical journal, 73(4), 1996, pp. 239-241
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
ISSN journal
0012835X
Volume
73
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
239 - 241
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-835X(1996)73:4<239:CODMFD>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Of two hundred Ethiopian patients with dyspepsia, multiple biopsies we re taken from the antrum of the stomach, Helicobacter pylori was cultu red from 85% of duodenal ulcer and in 75% of chronic antral gastritis patients, The overall Helicobacter pylori positivity was 70%. The sens itivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the t ests as compared to culture were as follows, respectively: direct urea se test 100%/87%/95%/100%, direct gram stain 60%/98%/99%/51%, histolog ical gram stain 66%/97%/98%/56%, Giemsa stain 100%/97%/99%/100% and Gi menez stain 100%/87%/95%/100%. It is concluded that gram staining of d irect tissue smear or histology is an insensitive method in the diagno sis of Helicobacter pylori, All the other tests, are shown to be valid , Urease test is an excellent test for provision of presumptive diagno sis of Helicobacter pylori while awaiting confirmation either by cultu re or histology.