We compared 140 appendectomies in a prospective study with regard to l
ength of operation, stay in hospital and intra- and postoperative comp
lications. We operated by four methods and made up four groups, 35 pat
ients in each: (1) application of RODER-loop and manual stump-sinking;
(2) application of RODER-loop without manual stump-sinking; (3) appli
cation of Endo-GIA; (4) conventional appendectomy according to McBurne
y. Intraoperative complications occurred mainly in laparoscopic append
ectomy, while disturbances of wound-healing were observed mainly in co
nventional appendectomy. The analysis of postoperative complications i
n laparoscopic appendectomy showed the most complications in the secon
d group (RODER-loop without stump-sinking), while using the Endo-GIA i
nvolved only a little risk. Tn a clear situs the laparoscopic appendec
tomy with the RODER-loop with manual stump-sinking is recommended; in
cases with a difficult preparation or advanced appendicitis the applic
ation of the Endo-GIA is a safe technique with the best results.