T. Fakler et al., EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS TO PREPARE PORCINE ADIPOCYTES FOR MEASUREMENT WITH AN ELECTRONIC PARTICLE NUMBER AND SIZE DETERMINATION APPARATUS, Journal of animal science, 74(10), 1996, pp. 2385-2393
Experimental investigations with mammalian adipose tissue require a de
termination of adipocyte number as a basis for expression of metabolic
and growth data. Determination of cell size is also important in adip
ose tissue because the fivefold or greater variation in adipocyte diam
eter in most growing and adult mammals precludes simple determination
of cell number to interpret the biological observations. There are two
approaches to determine adipocyte size and number: microscopic method
s and electronic particle counter methods. Microscopic methods use emb
edded sections, frozen sections, or isolated cells, whereas electronic
particle number and size instrumental methods use adipocytes released
from fixed tissue fragments or adipocytes fixed after isolation. The
advantage of the electronic approach is that it evaluates thousands of
particles, although the standard fixative, osmium, is quite toxic. Co
nsequently, we evaluated a number of alternative fixation methods to p
repare isolated porcine adipocytes for number and size determination b
y electronic instrumentation. Fixation in 3, 4, or 5% glutaraldehyde o
r in 4% formaldehyde were not acceptable procedures for porcine adipoc
ytes. The 4% glutaraldehyde fixation procedure was acceptable for isol
ated rat adipocytes (Stewart and Kaplan, 1993); porcine adipocytes see
m to be much more susceptible to breakage using these procedures than
rat adipocytes. We also added urea or Triton X-100 to glutaraldehyde-
and osmium-fixed cells to decrease clumping and adhesion of individual
cells; none of these additions was beneficial. Ability to store sampl
es would improve the logistics for these time-consuming analyses. Samp
les of osmium-fixed adipocytes were stored in osmium, in .9% NaCl (sal
ine) after removal of osmium, in 8 M urea after osmium removal with sa
line, or in .01% Triton X-100 after osmium removal with saline. Storag
e in urea or Triton was inappropriate because of irreversible clumping
of individual cells. Storage in osmium was acceptable for at least 30
d, and storage in saline was marginally acceptable. The variability o
f the size determination process for osmium-fixed adipocytes was evalu
ated.