ESTIMATION OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR CHAMBER AND STROKE VOLUME BY LIMITED M-MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND VALIDATION BY 2-DIMENSIONAL AND DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
G. Desimone et al., ESTIMATION OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR CHAMBER AND STROKE VOLUME BY LIMITED M-MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND VALIDATION BY 2-DIMENSIONAL AND DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, The American journal of cardiology, 78(7), 1996, pp. 801-807
This study has been designed to improve estimation of stroke volume fr
om linear left ventricular (LV) dimensions measured by M-mode echocard
iography, in symmetrically contracting ventricles. In experimental stu
dies, the ratio of LV epicardial long/short axes ''Z'' is about 1.3. W
e measured systolic and diastolic epicardial long and short axes by 2-
dimensional echocardiography in 115 adults with widely varying LV shor
t-axis dimensions (LV end-diastolic dimension = 3.95 to 8.3 cm). In a
learning series of 23 normotensive and 27 hypertensive subjects, Z(dia
stole) was 1.3 +/- 0.1 and Z(systole) = 1.2 +/- 0.1, similar to findin
gs in experimental animals. Regression equations were developed by com
paring LV volumes by M-mode and 2-dimensional echocardiography. In a t
est series (65 subjects), LV volumes were calculated using separate re
gression equations for end-diastolic volume ([LV end-diastolic dimensi
on](2) 4.765 - 0.288 x posterior wall thickness]) and for end-systolic
volume ([LV end-systolic dimension](2)[4.136 - 0.288 x posterior wall
thickness]). Because the term 0.288 x wall thickness was only about 8
% of the first term between brackets, the average wall thickness in th
e learning series was substituted in the Z-volume formulas applied to
the test series: end-diastolic volume = (4.5 x [LV end-diastolic dimen
sions](2)) and end-systolic volume = (3.72 x [LV end-diastolic dimensi
on](2)). The mean relative error produced with this simplified method
was 0.9% in diastole and 1.4% in systole. Compared with Teichholz' M-m
ode volume method, Z-derived end-diastolic volume in the test series w
as equally well related to 2-dimensional volumes (both r = 0.88),with
a better intercept (1.5 vs -23 ml, p < 0.001) and a slope closer to th
e identity line (1.1 vs 1.4). Similar results were found for systolic
volumes. In a second test series of 1,721 American Indian participants
in the Strong Heart Study without mitral regurgitation or segmental L
V wall motion abnormalities, Doppler-derived LV stroke volume (70 +/-
14 ml/beat) was similarly predicted by the Z-derived method (r = 0.65,
70 +/- 11 ml/beat) and Teichholz formulas (r = 0.64, 72 +/- 13 ml/bea
t), but Z-derived volumes had a regression line significantly closer t
o the identity line (p < 0.005). Thus, LV chamber and stroke volumes c
an be determined from M-mode LV diameters over a wide range of LV size
s and in epidemiologic as well as clinical populations. The performanc
e of this new method appears better than that obtained using the Teich
holz formula, with a formula that is easy to handle and makes calculat
ion of LV volumes by pocket calculator possible, even from limited ech
ocardiographic studies.