Background At present necropsy is done in less than 60% of cases of pe
rinatal death in the UK, despite the value of the procedure to the ber
eaved parents and their doctors. This low rate reflects the difficulty
in discussing the examination during the acute distress after the dea
th of a baby, and the personal and religious objections of many parent
s to necropsy. We compared post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI
) of the fetus with internal perinatal necropsy to assess whether MRI
examination is a feasible option for the 40% of cases where consent fo
r necropsy is not given or requested. Methods We examined 20 stillborn
, miscarried, or aborted fetuses by MRI and necropsy. Scanning was don
e in a 1 . 5 T system, in accordance with our protocol, immediately be
fore necropsy, The MRI and necropsy findings were compared to assess h
ow much diagnostic information was obtained by each technique. Finding
s In eight of the 20 cases the two examinations were in total agreemen
t about the abnormalities present. In eight cases the necropsy provide
d more detailed information than MRI examination, but in four cases th
e MRI information was more extensive than that obtained at necropsy. I
n two of the latter cases, abnormalities of the central nervous system
were seen only on MRI, Thus, in 12 (60%) of the 20 cases studied, MRI
had equivalent or better diagnostic sensitivity than internal necrops
y examination; in 18 (90%) of the 20 cases the two examinations were o
f similar clinical significance. Interpretation MRI of the stillborn o
r aborted fetus provides non-invasive access to information previously
available only from necropsy.