A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF ENOXAPARIN COMPARED WITH UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN IN THE PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLIC DISEASE IN ELDERLY INPATIENTS BEDRIDDEN FOR AN ACUTE MEDICAL ILLNESS

Citation
Jf. Bergmann et E. Neuhart, A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF ENOXAPARIN COMPARED WITH UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN IN THE PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLIC DISEASE IN ELDERLY INPATIENTS BEDRIDDEN FOR AN ACUTE MEDICAL ILLNESS, Thrombosis and haemostasis, 76(4), 1996, pp. 529-534
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System","Peripheal Vascular Diseas
Journal title
ISSN journal
03406245
Volume
76
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
529 - 534
Database
ISI
SICI code
0340-6245(1996)76:4<529:AMRDOE>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
A multicenter, randomized double-blind study compared in two parallel groups the efficacy and safety of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH ) enoxaparin 20 mg once daily, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000 IU twice daily, administered subcutaneously for 10 days, in the preven tion of venous thrombosis disease in 442 hospitalized elderly patients bedridden for an acute medical illness. The main efficacy endpoint wa s defined as the occurrence of venous thrombosis, diagnosed by a daily fibrinogen uptake test, and/or documented clinical pulmonary embolism . Intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy showed that the incidence of venous thromboembolic events was low: 4.8% (10/207) in the LMWH group (9 episodes of isotopic venous thrombosis and one of scintigraphic pu lmonary embolism), and 4.6% (10/216) in the UFH group (10 episodes of isotopic venous thrombosis). The two treatments were equivalent, where equivalence was defined as a maximum difference of 7% between the two groups (p = 0.0005). There were no significant differences in terms o f safety between the 216 patients in the LMWH group and the 223 patien ts in the UFH group who received at least one injection of the randomi zed treatment. During the study period, 15 patients (3.4%) died (7 in the LMWH group and 8 in the UFH group): 2 sudden deaths, one in each g roup, including one case in which pulmonary embolism could not be excl uded since no autopsy was performed, and 13 others deaths unrelated to the study treatments. Six patients (1.4%) presented a bleeding compli cation: 2 (0.9%) in the enoxaparin group (one major and one minor hemo rrhage), and 4 (1.8%) in the UFH group (2 major and 2 minor hemorrhage s). These results indicate that subcutaneous enoxaparin 20 mg once dai ly for 10 days is as effective and well tolerated as subcutaneous UFH 5000 IU twice daily in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in bedridden elderly in-patients presenting an acute medical illness.