A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF ENOXAPARIN COMPARED WITH UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN IN THE PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLIC DISEASE IN ELDERLY INPATIENTS BEDRIDDEN FOR AN ACUTE MEDICAL ILLNESS
Jf. Bergmann et E. Neuhart, A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY OF ENOXAPARIN COMPARED WITH UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN IN THE PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLIC DISEASE IN ELDERLY INPATIENTS BEDRIDDEN FOR AN ACUTE MEDICAL ILLNESS, Thrombosis and haemostasis, 76(4), 1996, pp. 529-534
A multicenter, randomized double-blind study compared in two parallel
groups the efficacy and safety of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH
) enoxaparin 20 mg once daily, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000
IU twice daily, administered subcutaneously for 10 days, in the preven
tion of venous thrombosis disease in 442 hospitalized elderly patients
bedridden for an acute medical illness. The main efficacy endpoint wa
s defined as the occurrence of venous thrombosis, diagnosed by a daily
fibrinogen uptake test, and/or documented clinical pulmonary embolism
. Intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy showed that the incidence of
venous thromboembolic events was low: 4.8% (10/207) in the LMWH group
(9 episodes of isotopic venous thrombosis and one of scintigraphic pu
lmonary embolism), and 4.6% (10/216) in the UFH group (10 episodes of
isotopic venous thrombosis). The two treatments were equivalent, where
equivalence was defined as a maximum difference of 7% between the two
groups (p = 0.0005). There were no significant differences in terms o
f safety between the 216 patients in the LMWH group and the 223 patien
ts in the UFH group who received at least one injection of the randomi
zed treatment. During the study period, 15 patients (3.4%) died (7 in
the LMWH group and 8 in the UFH group): 2 sudden deaths, one in each g
roup, including one case in which pulmonary embolism could not be excl
uded since no autopsy was performed, and 13 others deaths unrelated to
the study treatments. Six patients (1.4%) presented a bleeding compli
cation: 2 (0.9%) in the enoxaparin group (one major and one minor hemo
rrhage), and 4 (1.8%) in the UFH group (2 major and 2 minor hemorrhage
s). These results indicate that subcutaneous enoxaparin 20 mg once dai
ly for 10 days is as effective and well tolerated as subcutaneous UFH
5000 IU twice daily in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease
in bedridden elderly in-patients presenting an acute medical illness.