TROCARS IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY - C OSTS AND BENEFITS

Citation
Fe. Klee et al., TROCARS IN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY - C OSTS AND BENEFITS, Langenbecks Archiv fur Chirurgie, 1996, pp. 1310-1310
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00238236
Year of publication
1996
Supplement
2
Pages
1310 - 1310
Database
ISI
SICI code
0023-8236(1996):<1310:TIMIS->2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Nowadays, a variety of different trocar types are available, differing in diameter, material, reusability, and cost. The purpose of our stud y was to investigate the cost-benefit analysis of trocar types which a re used in our hospital. A total of 2947 patients underwent laparoscop ic surgery since January 1991. The study design was a retrospective da ta collection. Only paraumbilically inserted 10-12 mm trocary were inc luded in this study. In group 1 (n = 1567) a resterilisable 10-mm troc ar was used, in group 2 (n = 1365) a 10-mm or 12-mm single-use trocar. The rate of previously performed abdominal surgery was identical for both groups (4.8%). Trocar-related complications occurred in three pat ients of group 1 (0.2%, two bowel injuries). Although the costs of res terilisable trocars are four times higher than those of single-use tro cars, the economy of resterilisable trocars clearly appears by frequen t use. The forensic aspect of the ''safety mechanism'' in single-use t rocars remains unknown. However, the ''safety mechanism'' may fail in the case of an extremely obese abdominal wail, or severe adhesions. Th erefore, we perform a mini-laparotomy prior to trocar placement to min imize the risk of trocarrelated complications.