Nowadays, a variety of different trocar types are available, differing
in diameter, material, reusability, and cost. The purpose of our stud
y was to investigate the cost-benefit analysis of trocar types which a
re used in our hospital. A total of 2947 patients underwent laparoscop
ic surgery since January 1991. The study design was a retrospective da
ta collection. Only paraumbilically inserted 10-12 mm trocary were inc
luded in this study. In group 1 (n = 1567) a resterilisable 10-mm troc
ar was used, in group 2 (n = 1365) a 10-mm or 12-mm single-use trocar.
The rate of previously performed abdominal surgery was identical for
both groups (4.8%). Trocar-related complications occurred in three pat
ients of group 1 (0.2%, two bowel injuries). Although the costs of res
terilisable trocars are four times higher than those of single-use tro
cars, the economy of resterilisable trocars clearly appears by frequen
t use. The forensic aspect of the ''safety mechanism'' in single-use t
rocars remains unknown. However, the ''safety mechanism'' may fail in
the case of an extremely obese abdominal wail, or severe adhesions. Th
erefore, we perform a mini-laparotomy prior to trocar placement to min
imize the risk of trocarrelated complications.