Rk. Oka et al., DIFFERENCES IN TREATMENT OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION BY SEX, AGE, AND OTHER FACTORS (THE STANFORD 5-CITY PROJECT), The American journal of cardiology, 78(8), 1996, pp. 861-865
This study examines the temporal trends in the use of angiography foll
owed by revascularization procedures for acute myocardial infarction (
AMI) in 2,021 hospitalized men and 995 women aged 30 to 74 years who p
articipated in the Stanford Five-City Project during the years 1986 to
1992. Our sample included hospitalized patients who received a discha
rge diagnosis code of 410 through 414 and met study criteria for eithe
r a definite or possible AMI. Incident and recurrent infarctions occur
ring in the years 1986 through 1992 were included, but only the first
event in this period for each patient. We performed stepwise multiple
logistic regression analysis to determine the probability of: (1) rece
iving coronary angiography, (2) revascularization by either coronary b
ypass surgery or angioplasty among those with angiogram, and (3) throm
bolytic therapy, Age, year of procedure, disease severity, and time be
tween symptom onset and medical treatment were included as covariates.
After adjustment of these factors, women were less likely than men to
undergo angiography but were equally likely to undergo revascularizat
ion and thrombolysis. Hispanics and whites were equally likely to rece
ive angiography and thrombolysis, but Hispanics were less likely than
whites to undergo revascularization. Age and disease severity were inv
erse predictors of coronary angiography but not of revascularization.
Age, severity, and delay time between onset of symptoms and medical th
erapy were inverse predictors of thrombolysis; delay rime was signific
antly greater in women than in men and averaged >6 hours in both sexes
. The likelihood of receiving angiography, revascularization, and thro
mbolysis increased sharply over the study period.