GABA(A)-RECEPTOR-MEDIATED CONDUCTANCE AND ACTION-POTENTIAL WAVE-FORM IN CUTANEOUS AND MUSCLE AFFERENT NEURONS OF THE ADULT-RAT - DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION AND RESPONSE TO NERVE INJURY
Aa. Oyelese et Jd. Kocsis, GABA(A)-RECEPTOR-MEDIATED CONDUCTANCE AND ACTION-POTENTIAL WAVE-FORM IN CUTANEOUS AND MUSCLE AFFERENT NEURONS OF THE ADULT-RAT - DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION AND RESPONSE TO NERVE INJURY, Journal of neurophysiology, 76(4), 1996, pp. 2383-2392
1. Whole cell patch-clamp recordings were obtained from identified cut
aneous and muscle afferent neurons (33-60 mu m diam) in dissociated L(
4) and L(5) dorsal root ganglia (DRGs) from normal rats and from rats
2-3 wk after sciatic nerve ligation or crush injury. gamma-Aminobutyri
c acid (GABA)-induced conductance was compared in normal and injured n
eurons from both functional classes of sensory neurons. 2. Control cut
aneous afferent neurons had a peak GABA-mediated conductance of 287 +/
- 27 (SE) nS compared with 457 +/- 42 nS for control muscle afferent n
eurons. 3. An inflection on the downslope of the action potential was
observed in 47% of cutaneous afferent neurons compared with 20% of mus
cle afferent neurons. 4. After ligation and transection of the sciatic
nerve there was no change in the GABA-mediated conductance of muscle
afferent neurons or in the action potential waveform (23% inflected).
However, the cutaneous afferent neurons displayed a greater than twofo
ld increase in their GABA-mediated conductance and displayed a promine
nt reduction in the number of neurons with inflected action potentials
(13% inflected). Input resistance was similar in cutaneous and muscle
afferent neurons and decreased after ligation in cutaneous but not mu
scle afferents. Resting potential averaged from -50 to -56 mV in norma
l and ligated groups for both cutaneous and muscle afferent neurons. 5
. After crush injury in cutaneous afferent neurons where the transecte
d axons were allowed to regenerate into the distal nerve stump, GABA(A
)-receptor-mediated conductance was elevated compared with controls. H
owever, action potential waveform was not altered by crush injury, sug
gesting a differential regulation of these two properties in cutaneous
afferent neurons. 6. These data indicate that injury-induced plastici
ty of GABA(A)-receptor-mediated conductance and action potential wavef
orm occurs in cutaneous but not muscle afferent DRG neurons. It appear
s that peripherally derived influences are critical in maintaining the
electrophysiological phenotype of cutaneous afferent neurons but not
muscle afferent neurons.