W. Stummer et al., PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WITHIN EDEMATOUS BRAIN-TISSUE - CONSIDERATIONS ON SENSITIZER DOSE AND TIME POINT OF LASER IRRADIATION, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology.B, Biology, 36(2), 1996, pp. 179-181
Photosensitizer is known to spread with vasogenic edema fluid arising
from a cerebral lesion (Neurosurg 33:1075-1082, 1993), which may be es
sential for sensitizing malignant cells outside the main tumor mass. T
he present experiments seek to elucidate whether resultant necrosis of
perifocal brain tissue after laser irradiation follows a correspondin
g time pattern and whether damage depends on the photosensitizer dose.
Male Wistar rats were anaesthetized with chloralhydrate for venous ca
nnulation, craniotomy and focal cold lesion in order to induce vasogen
ic edema. Simultaneously, Photofrin IIR (PF II) was administered at a
dose of 5 mg kg(-1). The animals were re-anaesthetized after either 4,
12 or 24 h for the irradiation of lesion and perifocal tissue with 20
0 J cm(-2) of laser light (630 nm). The brains of other animals were i
rradiated 4 h after cold lesion with 200 J cm(-2) after receiving eith
er 0, 2.5 or 5 mg kg(-1) PF II (all groups: n=6). Resultant necrosis w
as assessed planimetrically in serial coronal cryosections of brains p
erfusion fixed 24 h after irradiation. Necrosis was significantly enha
nced with irradiation 4 h after cold lesion and photosensitizer (avg.
area +/-SD: 4.3 +/- 0.7 mm(2)) compared with lesion only (0.84 +/- 0.2
mm(2)). Maximal necrosis (6.3 +/- 1.6 mm(2)) occurred with irradiatio
n 12 h after lesion, whereas necrosis was only slightly increased with
irradiation at 24 h (2.8 +/- 0.4 mm(2)). Furthermore, the area of nec
rosis was dependent on the sensitizer dose (0 mg kg(-1): 0.7 +/- 0.3 m
m(2), 2.5 mg kg(-1): 2.09 +/- 0.2 mm(2), 5 mg kg(-1): 4.3 +/- 0.7 mm(2
); all differences p < 0.05). Therefore, to prevent unwanted side-effe
cts such as necrosis of edematous but otherwise healthy, peritumoral t
issue in the treatment of malignant cerebral tumors by PDT, tribute sh
ould be paid to the possibility of time and dose dependent sensitizati
on of the perifocal tissue after i.v. administration of photosensitize
r.