DETERMINATION OF HIGHLY CONCENTRATED NA, K, MG AND CA IN DIALYSIS SOLUTION WITH FLOW-INJECTION ONLINE DILUTION AND FLAME ATOMIC-ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY
T. Guo et al., DETERMINATION OF HIGHLY CONCENTRATED NA, K, MG AND CA IN DIALYSIS SOLUTION WITH FLOW-INJECTION ONLINE DILUTION AND FLAME ATOMIC-ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY, Analytica chimica acta, 331(3), 1996, pp. 263-270
An on-line flow injection dilution method for flame atomic absorption
spectrometry was developed. This method is based on the cascade method
of dilution. The method combines the technology of merging streams wi
th on-line sample volume reduction using stream splitting to obtain pr
ecise dilution factors: a series of split and confluence points are tr
aversed by the injected sample zone. At each split point, the sample v
olume is reduced and at each confluence point dilution occurs to an ex
tent governed by the relative how rates in the two merging streams. Us
ing various configurations of the manifold and by changing the flow ra
te of the carrier stream, dilution factors ranging from 10 to 10 000 a
re obtained. Normally, to achieve high dilution factors the carrier ho
w rate must be reduced. However, the dilution performance depends crit
ically on the carrier flow rate; when the latter is low, the throughpu
t is correspondingly reduced as well. In this work, it is shown that a
reasonably high dilution factor is achievable when using relatively h
igh carrier flow rates. Higher carrier flow rate provides precise dilu
tion factors with the use of peristaltic pumps. To combine precise per
formance with high sample throughput, the dilution range, using this m
ethod, is recommended at 10-3000. To demonstrate the performance of th
is manifold, high concentrations of Na, K, Mg and Ca were measured in
a dialysis solution. Using a 1000-fold dilution, the sample throughput
for a fully automated analysis was 70 measurements per hour, with a p
recision of approximately 2% (RSD n=11). The automated results were ch
ecked with a conventional manual dilution method and the results betwe
en the two methods were comparable and with no significant difference
found at the 95% level (t-test) for analyte concentration range from 6
4 000 to 450 mg l(-1).