R. Shinkawa et al., EFFECTS OF CUBAN ANALOG (SWR-104SA), A NE W HISTAMINE H-2-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST, ON GASTRIC-ACID SECRETION AND EXPERIMENTAL ULCER FORMATION, Yakugaku zasshi, 116(10), 1996, pp. 783-791
The antagonism of histamine H-2-receptor by SWR-104SA -N-[3[3-(1-piper
idinylmethyl)phenoxy]propyl]-spiro ne-2,9'-pentacyclo-[4.3.0.0.O-2,O-5
.O-3,O-8.(4,7)] nonane]-4'-carboxamide monooxalate) was estimated usin
g the isolated guinea-pig atrium and gastric acid secretion in rats. T
he concentration-response curves for the positive chronotropic effect
of histamine on the atrium were displaced to the right in parallel wit
hout change in the maximum response by SWR-104SA and roxatidine acetat
e hydrochloride (roxatidine). The pA(2) values of SWA-104SA and roxati
dine acetate hydrochloride were 7.27 and 7.38, respectively. The slope
s of the regression line of log (DR-1) against log SWR-104SA and roxat
idine concentration were 1.00 and 0.92, respectively. There was no sig
nificant difference between the two compounds with respect to the hist
amine H-2-receptor antagonism and/or binding manner in vitro. In the r
at gastric fistula model stimulated by histamine, however, antisecreto
ry potency of SWR-104SA was 3 times less than that of roxatidine. SWR-
104SA given p.o. prevented the formation of gastric lesion induced by
HCl-ethanol and indomethacin dose-dependently, roxatidine also prevent
ed its formation by HCl-ethanol, but failed to prevent that by indomet
hacine. These antiulcer activities of SWR-104SA were shown at the less
er doses of antisecretory activity. On the other hand, roxatidine did
not prevent the ulcer formation at the same dose level of antisecretor
y activity. These results indicate that the antiulcer effect of SWR-10
4SA is not caused by the antisecretory action alone.In addition, the m
ucosal protective activity of SWR-104SA for HCl-ethanol induced gastri
c lesion was independent of endogenous prostaglandins. Moreover SWR-10
4SA had inhibitory effects on indomethacin-induced gastric hypermotili
ty in rats. These actions may partly explain the gastric protection of
this compound and additional mechanisms such as mucosal blood flow co
uld be involved in the antiulcer efficacy. Consequently, it appears th
at SWR-104SA is a new antiulcer drug that exerts a potent cytoprotecti
ve effect in addition to its gastric antisecretory activity.