A rigorous performance evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit f
or the determination of atrazine in water samples was undertaken, Elev
en individual batches of samples containing standards and spiked drink
ing waters were analysed and precision, bias and limit of detection we
re measured using statistical analysis. The technique was shown to be
capable of achieving performance criteria (a total standard deviation
of less than 5% or 2.5 ng, whichever is the greater) demanded of moder
n analytical systems and achieved a limit of detection of 9.2 ng l(-1)
. There was no statistically significant bias measured for drinking wa
ter samples, Interference tests showed that the atrazine immunoassay w
as not significantly affected in the pH range 4.0-8.0 or by drinking w
ater matrix components (anions, cations and chlorination by-products),
even at their maximum allowable concentrations, There was a small ext
ent of cross-reaction with simazine and atrazine degradation products,
but given the persistence of atrazine; through its resistance to hydr
olysis, breakdown products are likely to be present at much lower conc
entrations than the parent compound in drinking mater, Simazine may po
tentially be more problematic, so it mould be prudent to monitor a pro
portion of samples for simazine to determine the extent to which this
may be contributing to the 'atrazine' measured in drinking water sampl
es using the EIA kit.