J. Kohn et F. Worgotter, CORTICOFUGAL FEEDBACK CAN REDUCE THE VISUAL LATENCY OF RESPONSES TO ANTAGONISTIC STIMULI, Biological cybernetics, 75(3), 1996, pp. 199-209
A biophysically realistical model of the primary visual pathway is des
igned, including feedback connections from the visual cortex to the la
teral geniculate nucleus (LGN) - the so-called corticofugal pathway. T
he model comprises up to 10 000 retina and LGN cells divided into the
ON and the OFF pathway according to their contrast response characteri
stics. An additional 6000 cortical simple cells are modeled. Apart fro
m the direct excitatory afferent pathway we include strong mutual inhi
bition between the ON and the OFF subsystems. In addition, we propose
a novel type of paradoxical corticofugal connection pattern which link
s ON dominated cortical simple cells to OFF-center LGN cells and vice
versa. In accordance with physiological findings these connections are
weakly excitatory and do not interfere with the steady-state response
s to constant illumination, because during the steady-state inhibition
arising from the active pathway effectively silences the non-stimulat
ed pathway. At the moment of a contrast reversal the effect of the par
adoxical connection pattern comes into play and the depolarization of
the previously silent channel is accelerated, leading to a latency red
uction of up to 4 ms using moderate synaptic weights. With increased w
eights reductions of more than 10 ms can be achieved. We introduce dif
ferent synaptic characteristics for the feedback (AMPA, NMDA, AMPA + N
MDA) and show that the strongest latency reduction is obtained for a c
ombination of the membrane channels (i.e., AMPA + NMDA). The effect of
the proposed paradoxical connection pattern is self-regulating; becau
se the levels of inhibition and paradoxical excitation are always driv
en by the same inputs (strong inhibition is counterbalanced by a stron
ger paradoxical excitation and vice versa). In addition, the latency r
eduction for a contrast inversion which ends at a small absolute contr
ast level (small contrast step) is stronger than the reduction for an
inversion with large final contrast (large contrast step). This leads
to a more pronounced reduction in the reaction times for weak stimuli.
Thus, reaction time differences for different contrast steps are smoo
thed out.