This paper aims to study the nature of social services in Hong Kong. I
t argues that the Hong Kong government regards social services mainly
as a means of promoting capital accumulation and political legitimacy.
It does not treat the promotion of social services as an end itself.
While the government devotes increasing amounts of money to social ser
vices, it prevents them from challenging the capitalist economy and au
thoritarian polity; it has established the prohibited areas of strong
government, low direct tax rates, surplus budget policy and the domina
nce of economic policy over social policy. These prohibited areas show
that while the Hong Kong government does not follow closely the laiss
ez-faire ideal, the private market and market values have important in
fluence on the government's policy.