Voting patterns in the United National General Assembly provide an exc
eptionally good set of evidence for observing issues and alignments of
states in international politics. We analyze those patterns in three
post-cold war sessions of the General Assembly and compare them with t
he alignments and issues that characterized sessions during the cold w
ar. We find new groups and alignments (with most of Eastern Europe now
voting with rather than against West European positions) and a new pr
ominence of long-term North-South issues as they now relate to questio
ns of redefining ''human security'' in the post-cold war world. The pr
edominant General Assembly division is between richer and poorer natio
ns. Key correlates of voting with the North are wealth democracy, and
proportionately low levels of trade with the United States.