AN APPROACH TO DOSE MEASUREMENT FOR TOTAL-BODY IRRADIATION

Purpose: An approach is proposed to allow the interpretation of diode measurements on patients receiving total body irradiation (TBI) in opp osed lateral fields as midplane dose measurements. Methods and Materia ls: This technique consists of making measurements on both entrance an d exit sides of any ray path along which the midplane dose is desired, The diode on the entrance side is calibrated so that its output is in dicative of the dose delivered at the depth of maximum dose along the ray, The diode on the exit side is calibrated so that its output repre sents the dose that would have been delivered to that depth had the me dium (the patient) been semi-infinite. Because these two measurements Lie along the same ray, they are related by a simple depth-dose equati on from which the effective absorption coefficient (mu(eff)) can be de termined. The dose at the midplane is calculated using this mu(eff) in a similar equation. Results: The validity of this approach was checke d with measurements at isocenter and at the TBI distance using a polys tyrene phantom. In both cases, the calculated midplane dose was within reasonable experimental error (range similar to+/-2% on average) of t he measured dose, Measurements on eight patients showed the excellent reproducibility of entrance surface measurements (standard deviation [ SD] similar to+/-1%), compared to that of midplane measurements (SD si milar to+/-4%) and exit surface measurements (SD similar to less than or equal to 8%). Midplane doses determined from these equations confir med that dose inhomogeneity using this opposed lateral technique is on the order of +/-10% aith highest doses delivered to the calves and lo west to the lungs. Conclusion: Recent measurements made on TBI patient s have shown that a commercial eight-diode system can be used successf ully to measure the dose delivered to the midplane within an accuracy of similar to+/-4%. The reproducibility of entrance surface measuremen ts (similar to+/-1%) shows that such measurements provide the accuracy required for quality assurance purposes. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Inc.