Mm. Worthbutler et al., ELICITING THE VIEWS OF EXPERIENCED MIDWIVES ABOUT THE ASSESSMENT OF COMPETENCE IN MIDWIFERY, Midwifery, 12(4), 1996, pp. 182-190
Objective: to investigate the views of the English National Board for
Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting (ENB) Professional Midwifery Ad
visory Network (PMAN) members about the assessment of competence in mi
dwifery. Design: initial questionnaire followed by a group discussion
of a summary of the data from the completed questionnaires. Participan
ts: 54 PMAN midwives representing education, management, research, pra
ctice and supervision; plus six ENB Education Officers (midwifery). Fi
ndings: the response rate to the questionnaires was 75%. In the group
discussion the PMAN members commented particularly on: the large numbe
r of items identified as needing assessment in practice and by written
work; lack of total agreement on the assessment in practice of normal
delivery; differences in practitioners' perceptions of assessment; th
e number and range of areas to be assessed; differences in expectation
of 'task' assessment versus 'holistic' assessment; lack of assessment
in simulation; heavy reliance on written work in assessment. Conclusi
ons: the group's discussion of the questionnaire data revealed further
interesting data, which added considerably to the initial analysis an
d overview. Some participants had misinterpreted the instructions and
found that what they had filled in did not accurately reflect their be
liefs about assessment. General consensus was reached on the need for
a national standard or framework for assessment and more emphasis to b
e placed on assessing students in the practice setting whilst ensuring
this includes knowledge and understanding and not merely psyche-motor
skills. The major implications include effective preparation of asses
sors and more teacher involvement in practice to support the midwife a
ssessors.