We discuss capriciousness in decisions to charge homicide defendants w
ith capital crimes. We propose using Shannon information to assess cap
riciousness in a charging system and apply Shannon Information to anal
yze new data from San Francisco County, California. We show that about
two-thirds of the potential systemic capriciousness is removed by the
explanatory variables available. The one-third remaining is dependent
on inherently unstable features of charging practices that necessaril
y produce capriciousness.