A COMPARISON OF PROLIFERATION MARKERS AND THEIR PROGNOSTIC VALUE FOR WOMEN WITH ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA - KI-67, PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN, AND FLOW CYTOMETRIC S-PHASE FRACTION
B. Nordstrom et al., A COMPARISON OF PROLIFERATION MARKERS AND THEIR PROGNOSTIC VALUE FOR WOMEN WITH ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA - KI-67, PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN, AND FLOW CYTOMETRIC S-PHASE FRACTION, Cancer, 78(9), 1996, pp. 1942-1951
BACKGROUND. The understanding of proliferation is a central issue in o
ncology. Several methods exist for the assessment of the growth fracti
on and cell-cycle time, but comparative studies that give the clinicia
n advice about the most reliable use of new markers are few. The aim o
f the current study was to perform methodologic, descriptive, comparat
ive, and prognostic studies of Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antig
en (PCNA), and flow cytometric S-phase fraction (SPF) in endometrial c
arcinoma. METHODS. The expression of Ki-57 (n = 175) acid PCNA (n = 14
6) were studied immunohistochemically, and the SPF (n = 297) by now cy
tometry. The median follow-up time was 78 months. RESULTS. Neither Ki-
67 nor PCNA had any correlation to either the stage or the histopathol
ogic subtype of the tumors, but they were covariant with. the histopat
hologic grade (P < 0.05). There was an interrelationship between Ki-67
and PCNA (P < 0.001), and both were associated with the size of the S
PF (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Mean SPF was high in advan
ced stages and strongly associated with histopathologic subtype (P < 0
.0001) and ploidy (P < 0.0001). Tumors with strong Ki-67 expression we
re more often aneuploid (P < 0.01). In initial analyses, Ki-67 and SPF
were predictors of poor survival (P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectivel
y), whereas PCNA was not. When SPF was added to a comprehensive multiv
ariate model, Ki-67 provided no further prognostic information, wherea
s SPF remained a powerful predictor of survival. CONCLUSIONS. Ki-67 an
d, to a lesser extent, PCNA, give approximate estimates of the growth
fraction, whereas SPF only reflects the proportion of cells in S-phase
. However, SPF is by far the strongest predictor of survival. (C) 1996
American Cancer Society.