This paper examines how proportional transaction costs, short-sale con
straints, and margin requirements affect inferences based on asset ret
urn data about intertemporal marginal rates of substitution (IMRSs). I
t is shown that small transaction costs can greatly reduce the require
d variability of IMRSs. This suggests that the low variability of many
parametric, aggregate consumption based IMRSs need not be inconsisten
t with asset return data. Euler inequalities for a transaction cost ec
onomy with power utility are tested using aggregate consumption data a
nd returns on stocks and short maturity U.S. Treasury bills. In the ma
jority of cases there is little evidence against power utility specifi
cations with low risk-aversion parameters. The results are obtained wi
th transaction costs on stocks as small as .5% of price, and are in sh
arp contrast to the strong rejection of the analogous Euler equalities
for a frictionless economy.