PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resona
nce (MR) imaging with that of ultrasound (US) in the detection of extr
aocular extension of uveal melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 70 pati
ents the diagnosis of melanoma and absence or presence of extraocular
growth were confirmed with histologic examination (13 patients) or wit
h ophthalmoscopy and surgery (57 patients). Unenhanced and enhanced T1
-weighted and T2-weighted MR imaging was performed with surface coils
at 1.5 T. A- and B-mode US scans were obtained with 8- and 10-MHz prob
es,respectively. RESULTS: Extraocular growth was confirmed in seven pa
tients: Five patients had retrobulbar tumor, and two had optic nerve i
nfiltration. US enabled detection in three cases, whereas six cases we
re diagnosed with MR imaging including both cases of optic nerve infil
tration. False-positive findings were more frequent with US (n = 5) th
an with MR imaging (n = 1). CONCLUSION: MR imaging proved to be more s
ensitive and more specific than US in the detection of extraocular ext
ension of uveal melanoma.