IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DETERMINATION OF ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR - COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ASSESSMENT OF STAINING AND CORRELATION WITH CLINICAL OUTCOME OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
Dm. Barnes et al., IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DETERMINATION OF ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR - COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF ASSESSMENT OF STAINING AND CORRELATION WITH CLINICAL OUTCOME OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS, British Journal of Cancer, 74(9), 1996, pp. 1445-1451
Immunohistochemical staining for oestrogen receptor (ER) has been carr
ied out using antibody ER ID5 on 170 women who received first-line tam
oxifen treatment for evaluable metastatic breast cancer. ER status had
been determined some years previously, using a ligand-binding cytosol
assay. The adequacy of the tissue used for the cytosol assay was alwa
ys checked by histology on an adjacent block and was deemed to be typi
cal of the tumour overall as was the block used for immunohistochemist
ry. Six different methods were used to assess the degree of staining a
nd comparisons were made to determine which method gave the most clini
cally relevant results. Clinical outcome was assessed both in terms of
duration of response to tamoxifen determined by log-rank analysis and
type of response using the chi-squared test. The ER immunohistochemic
al assay gave superior results compared with the cytosol assay, with a
ll of the subjective methods of assessment of staining giving statisti
cally significant correlations with clinical outcome. The additional c
ontribution of progesterone receptor (PR) staining with antibody NCL P
GR was also studied.