This study used base-year data from a large and nationally representat
ive data base (NELS:88) to identify some important explanatory factors
for gender differences in science performance. Middle school science
classes were selected for study because students have little choice ov
er their coursework at this level. By separating a standardized test o
f general science achievement into its life science and physical scien
ce domains, we documented a large advantage for boys on the subtest of
physical science and a modest advantage for girls in life science. Im
portantly, in physical science, the disadvantage for girls is more pro
nounced for the most able students, Explanations for these gender diff
erence focus on laboratory experience. Only about 25% of eighth grader
s' science classes provide laboratory experiences at least weekly, and
these experiences are more common in stand-alone middle schools enrol
ling more affluent students. Such laboratory experiences are especiall
y beneficial for girls' achievement in physical science, but not boys'
. We conclude that these results argue for increasing experiential and
hands-on learning in middle school science classes-particularly in th
e physical sciences-as a means to promote gender equity in science ach
ievement at this important educational level. The study has implicatio
ns for the underrepresentation of women in physical science careers. (
C) 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.