Df. Kelly et al., HYPEREMIA FOLLOWING TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - RELATIONSHIP TO INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION AND OUTCOME, Journal of neurosurgery, 85(5), 1996, pp. 762-771
The role of posttraumatic hyperemia in the development of raised intra
cranial pressure (ICP) has important pathophysiological and therapeuti
c implications. To determine the relationship between hyperemia (cereb
ral blood flow (CBF) > 55 ml/100 g/minute), intracranial hypertension
(ICP > 20 mm Hg), and neurological outcome, 193 simultaneous measureme
nts of ICP and CBF (xenon-133 method) were obtained in 59 patients wit
h moderate and severe head injury. Hyperemia was associated with an in
creased incidence of simultaneous intracranial hypertension compared t
o nonhyperemic CBF measurements (32.2% vs. 21.6%, respectively; p < 0.
059). However, in 78% of blood flow studies in which ICP was greater t
han 20 mm Hg. CBF was less than or equal to 55 ml/100 g/minute. At lea
st one episode of hyperemia was documented in 34% of patients, all of
whom had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 9 or below. In 12 individ
uals with hyperemia without simultaneous intracranial hypertension, IC
P was greater than 20 mm Hg for an average of 11 +/- 16 hours and favo
rable outcomes were seen in 75% of patients. In contrast, in eight ind
ividuals with hyperemia and at least one episode of hyperemia-associat
ed intracranial hypertension, ICP was greater than 20 mm Hg for an ave
rage of 148 +/- 84 hours (p < 0.001), and a favorable outcome was seen
in only one patient (p < 0.001). Compared to the remainder of the coh
ort, patients with hyperemia-associated intracranial hypertension were
distinctive in being the youngest, exhibiting the lowest GCS scores (
all less than or equal to 6), and having the highest incidence of effa
ced basilar cisterns and intractable intracranial hypertension. In the
majority of individuals with hyperemia-associated intracranial hypert
ension, their clinical profile suggests the occurrence of a severe ini
tial insult with resultant gross impairment of metabolic vasoreactivit
y and pressure antoregulation. In a minority of these patients, howeve
r, high CBF may be coupled to a hypermetabolic state, given their resp
onsiveness to metabolic suppressive therapy. In patients with hyperemi
a but without intracranial hypertension, elevated CBF is also likely t
o be a manifestation of appropriate coupling to increased metabolic de
mand consistent with a generally favorable outcome. This study support
s the concept that there are multiple etiologies of both elevated bloo
d flow and intracranial hypertension after head injury.