Pd. Waite et al., THE STABILITY OF MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT USING LE-FORT-I OSTEOTOMY WITHAND WITHOUT GENIAL BONE-GRAFTING, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 25(4), 1996, pp. 264-267
The purpose of this study was to determine whether better stability is
achieved with genial bone grafts and four-plate rigid fixation for la
rge advancement Le Fort I osteotomies of the maxilla than with nongraf
ted osteotomies. We analyzed radiographic data on 22 patients with obs
tructive sleep apnea syndrome. All patients underwent Le Fort I osteot
omy for maxillary advancement, 11 patients without bone grafts and 11
patients with bone grafts harvested from the mandibular symphyseal are
a. Bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies and genial tubercl
e advancements were also performed in all patients. Patients in the ge
nial bone-grafted group had a mean advancement (surgical change) of 9.
7 mm and a mean relapse (postsurgical change) of 0.7 mm (7%). Patients
who had rigid fixation alone had a mean advancement of 10 mm and a me
an relapse of 1.8 mm (18%). It is concluded that the stability with ge
nial bone grafts to the lateral wall of the maxilla with four-plate ri
gid fixation was better than in the nongrafted group.