THORACIC VERSUS LUMBAR EPIDURAL ANESTHESIAS EFFECT ON PAIN CONTROL AND ILEUS RESOLUTION AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY

Citation
Am. Scott et al., THORACIC VERSUS LUMBAR EPIDURAL ANESTHESIAS EFFECT ON PAIN CONTROL AND ILEUS RESOLUTION AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY, Surgery, 120(4), 1996, pp. 688-695
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00396060
Volume
120
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
688 - 695
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-6060(1996)120:4<688:TVLEAE>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Background. Epidural anesthesia as a perioperative adjunct has been sh own to provide superior pain control and has been implicated in more r apid ileus resolution after major abdominal surgery, possibly through a sympatholytic mechanism. Studies suggest that the vertebral level of epidural administration influences these parameters. Methods. One hun dred seventy-nine patients (120 male, 59 female; average age, 36 years ) underwent restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis or fami lial polyposis between 1989 and 1995. Patients were grouped according to type of anesthesia. Group THO (n = 53) received thoracic (T6 to T10 ) epidurals. Group LUM (n = 51) received lumbar (L2 to L4 epidurals, a nd group PCA (n = 75) received patient-controlled intravenous narcotic analgesia. Patients were compared for complications, perioperative ri sk factors, postoperative pain and ileus resolution. Results. Epidural narcotics, alone or combined with local anesthetics, were administere d for an average of 2 (LUM) to 4 (THO) days without significant compli cations. infrequent problems related to the epidural catheters include d self-limited headaches or back pain (four) and site infections (two) . Epidural failure, as measured by conversion to PCA for inadequate pa in control, was nor significantly greater for LUM (25 %) than THO (23 %). Average pain scores, rated daily on a visual analog scale, were si gnificantly higher (indicating more pain) for PCA patients (4.2) durin g postoperative days 1 through 5 than for LUM (3.5) (p < 0.05) and for THO (2.4) (p < 0.05). Ileus resolution as determined by stool output and return of bowel sounds, was significantly faster in THO than in LU M or PCA (p < 0.05). Resolution of ileus was not significantly differe nt between PCA and LUM (p > 0.5). Conclusions. Thoracic epidural analg esia has distinct advantages over both lumbar epidural or traditional patient-controlled analgesia in shortening parameters measuring postop erative ileus and in reducing surgical pain. The procedure is safe and associated with low morbidity. Thoracic epidural anesthesia is also e conomically justifiable and may prove to impact significantly on futur e postoperative management by reducing length of hospitalization Our d ata and those of others are most striking in these regards for patient s with thoracic catheters, indicating the importance of vertebral leve l in epidural drug administration.