Am. Scott et al., THORACIC VERSUS LUMBAR EPIDURAL ANESTHESIAS EFFECT ON PAIN CONTROL AND ILEUS RESOLUTION AFTER RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY, Surgery, 120(4), 1996, pp. 688-695
Background. Epidural anesthesia as a perioperative adjunct has been sh
own to provide superior pain control and has been implicated in more r
apid ileus resolution after major abdominal surgery, possibly through
a sympatholytic mechanism. Studies suggest that the vertebral level of
epidural administration influences these parameters. Methods. One hun
dred seventy-nine patients (120 male, 59 female; average age, 36 years
) underwent restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis or fami
lial polyposis between 1989 and 1995. Patients were grouped according
to type of anesthesia. Group THO (n = 53) received thoracic (T6 to T10
) epidurals. Group LUM (n = 51) received lumbar (L2 to L4 epidurals, a
nd group PCA (n = 75) received patient-controlled intravenous narcotic
analgesia. Patients were compared for complications, perioperative ri
sk factors, postoperative pain and ileus resolution. Results. Epidural
narcotics, alone or combined with local anesthetics, were administere
d for an average of 2 (LUM) to 4 (THO) days without significant compli
cations. infrequent problems related to the epidural catheters include
d self-limited headaches or back pain (four) and site infections (two)
. Epidural failure, as measured by conversion to PCA for inadequate pa
in control, was nor significantly greater for LUM (25 %) than THO (23
%). Average pain scores, rated daily on a visual analog scale, were si
gnificantly higher (indicating more pain) for PCA patients (4.2) durin
g postoperative days 1 through 5 than for LUM (3.5) (p < 0.05) and for
THO (2.4) (p < 0.05). Ileus resolution as determined by stool output
and return of bowel sounds, was significantly faster in THO than in LU
M or PCA (p < 0.05). Resolution of ileus was not significantly differe
nt between PCA and LUM (p > 0.5). Conclusions. Thoracic epidural analg
esia has distinct advantages over both lumbar epidural or traditional
patient-controlled analgesia in shortening parameters measuring postop
erative ileus and in reducing surgical pain. The procedure is safe and
associated with low morbidity. Thoracic epidural anesthesia is also e
conomically justifiable and may prove to impact significantly on futur
e postoperative management by reducing length of hospitalization Our d
ata and those of others are most striking in these regards for patient
s with thoracic catheters, indicating the importance of vertebral leve
l in epidural drug administration.