Sj. Knechtle et al., IMPACT OF IMPROVING IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE TREATMENT ON OUTCOME IN CADAVERIC KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION, Surgery, 120(4), 1996, pp. 719-724
Background. Since the advent of cyclosporine-based immunosuppression f
or cadaveric kidney transplants in 1983, several changes have been mad
e in immunosuppressive management at the University of Wisconsin. Sinc
e 1986, OKT3 has been available to treat steroid-resistant rejection;
since 1992, OKT3 has been used as an induction agent replacing antilym
phocyte globulin; and since 1993, mycophenolate mofetil has been used
in 104 patients. Methods. The impact of different immunosuppressive st
rategies on overall and immunologic graft survival (defined as graft l
oss caused by rejection) was evaluated in 1210 primary cadaveric renal
transplants at the University of Wisconsin. Covariables, including de
gree of human leukocyte antigen matching, age, gender, cause of kidney
failure, and early graft dysfunction, were evaluated. The series was
subdivided into four eras according to immunosuppressive regimen, and
the results were analyzed by era. Results. Our principal findings are
that immunologic graft survival has improved significantly during this
series whereas overall graft survival has not. Mycophenolate was asso
ciated with a significant decrease in acute rejection. For a given pat
ient, graft loss from rejection becomes less likely over time. Late re
jection poses a greater risk than early rejection for graft loss. Conc
lusions. Improving outcomes may be related to improving immunosuppress
ive treatment,increasing degree of human leukocyte antigen matching, a
nd better early graft function.